Company due diligence reports
AI-assisted due diligence reports for companies in Europe
Order a source-backed PDF report covering company profile, officer history, corporate events, sanctions screening, red flags and analyst-ready risk context for onboarding, transactions and investigations.
What each report covers
A due diligence report should answer the first practical questions about a company: where it is registered, whether it appears active, who is connected to it, what public records are available, and which risk indicators deserve closer review.
Registry profile
Core company identifiers, status, jurisdictional context and available registry events from supported public sources, presented so another reviewer can understand the basis of the report.
Directors and officers
Officer appointments, resignations, roles and relevant changes over time where the source data supports it, including dates and role context when available.
Sanctions screening
Entity and officer screening against sanctions and watchlist sources, with potential matches presented for human review instead of treated as automatic conclusions.
Risk indicators
Structured red flags, notable corporate changes and concise findings that help analysts decide what to check next before relying on the counterparty.
Supported company jurisdictions
NC Data focuses on practical company research across major European public sources. Coverage depends on what each jurisdiction makes available and how consistently source records identify companies, officers and filing events.
- Spain: BORME and related Spanish public-source context.
- United Kingdom: Companies House profiles, filings and officer data.
- France: French company registry and business identifiers.
- Switzerland: Zefix and Swiss commercial register context.
- Italy: Registro Imprese and available corporate record context.
When to order a due diligence report
Use a one-off report when you need a structured first pass on a company and do not yet need a full case workspace. This is useful before supplier onboarding, distributor checks, investment screening, litigation support, fraud review or any situation where a company name has to be turned into a short, reviewable research file.
The report is not a substitute for legal advice, audit work or a regulated compliance decision. It is a research product: it organizes public-source records, screening results and risk context so a human reviewer can decide what matters and whether more work is needed.
Counterparty onboarding
Check whether a new supplier, client or partner has a coherent public profile and whether any obvious risk signals need escalation.
Transaction support
Give deal teams a concise view of company status, officers, filings and watchlist context before deeper diligence begins.
Investigation triage
Turn a company name into a starting file with identifiers, connected people and records that can guide the next research step.
What makes the report useful after delivery
A due diligence report is most useful when it can be checked, forwarded and revisited. NC Data reports are designed around that review process rather than around a black-box score.
- Clear company identifiers so the reviewed entity is not confused with a similarly named business.
- Separate sections for registry profile, officers, events, sanctions checks and risk observations.
- Concise language that explains why a finding may matter and what should be checked next.
- Source-aware output that helps reviewers trace the basis of important statements.
- A path into the full platform when a one-off report becomes an ongoing case.
Questions a report is built to answer
The best first-pass report does not try to close every risk question. It gives the reviewer a clean starting point and makes the next decision easier: proceed, request more information, escalate to enhanced due diligence or open a deeper investigation.
That makes the report useful for teams that need speed but cannot rely on a bare database extract. A short due diligence file should explain the reviewed entity, the records found, the screening context and the open questions clearly enough that another person can pick up the review without starting again and understand the next step. It also helps separate confirmed information from research leads.
- Which legal entity did we review, and what identifiers support that match?
- What does the available public record say about company status, officers and recent changes?
- Are there sanctions, watchlist or other risk signals that need human review?
- What findings should be checked before relying on the company for onboarding, investment or transaction work?
- Does this remain a one-off report, or should it become a monitored case inside the platform?
One-off report
No account required for standalone reports. Use the public company search, select the company and receive a PDF output for the supported source coverage.
Workspace users
Reports inside the platform
Registered users can combine reports with document analysis, case management, entity monitoring and supervised evidence extraction when the question extends beyond one company profile.